NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 920M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1485MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 920M
0.733 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+314%
3.041 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 920M
326
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+1027%
3676
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce 920M
85
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+1862%
1668
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 900M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1485 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.083 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.041 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK208B
GPU Name
TU116
N16V-GM
GPU Variant
N18P-G61
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
