NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs AMD FirePro M3900
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 920M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
224 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 33W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 920M
+205%
0.733 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Oct 2010
GeForce 900M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
160
32
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
33W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK208B
GPU Name
Seymour
N16V-GM
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
