NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs AMD Radeon R7 A265
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock825MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A265
+3065%
0.633 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
825 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.23GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.116 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
2.116 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
Opal
G98-700-U2
GPU Variant
Opal XT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
80 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
