NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs AMD Radeon R5 M320
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R5 M320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R5 M320 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock855MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
312 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M320
+2635%
0.547 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
780 MHz
-
Boost Clock
855 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
11.23GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.116 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.840 GPixel/s
2.116 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.10 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
547.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
Jet
G98-700-U2
GPU Variant
Jet PRO
(216-0856040)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
80 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
