Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 910M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

NVIDIA GeForce 910M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 910M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 910M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 150W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 910M
0.492 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 +6544%
32.69 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 900M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1001 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.02GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
76
384
Shading Units
9728
32
TMUs
304
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.128 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
20.51 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
492.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
20.51 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK208B
GPU Name
AD103
N16V-GL
GPU Variant
-
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net