Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
RTX A400 +905%
2.706 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 8
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

640MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
6
112
Shading Units
768
28
TMUs
24
20
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
80 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GA107
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net