NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
12688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+24167%
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 8
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
100
112
Shading Units
12800
28
TMUs
400
20
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
80 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
AD102
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
