Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 195W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition +1108%
3.25 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Apr 2013
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

640MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
1536
28
TMUs
128
20
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
195W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GK104
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.0
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net