CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
Categories
English
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
More VRAM (640GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
+668%
0.269 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Oct 2009
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
112
Shading Units
16
28
TMUs
8
20
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
80 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GT216
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
2
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870
3
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD Radeon Pro V340
4
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD Radeon RX 560
5
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD FirePro D500
6
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 6144 SP
7
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD FireStream 9370
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs ATI Radeon X1050
Related News
1
Intel's All-Big-Core Processors Are On the Way
2
AMD Unveils Future Plans: Introducing Zen7 Architecture and MI500 Series
3
AMD Set to Evenly Compete with Intel in the Server CPU Market
4
AMD Launches New Instinct MI350 AI Accelerator
5
NVIDIA Plans to Launch Next-Generation Rubin Accelerators in September
6
AMD Unveils New Zen5 Processor
7
TSMC Completes Trial Production of 2nm Process with an Impressive 90% Yield
8
Intel Confirms Nova Lake Processors, Adopting 14A Process Technology
9
NVIDIA is Preparing to Launch a Gaming Laptop APU Equivalent to the 4070
10
Is the AMD Ryzen 9000G Desktop CPU Coming Soon the Final Zen 5 Release?
© 2025 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy