NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
More VRAM (640GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
72 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
+740%
0.269 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 8
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
40
28
TMUs
4
20
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
80 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
RV620
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
