NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
Arc A310
+899%
2.688 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 8
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
768
28
TMUs
32
20
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
80 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
DG2-128
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
