Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
18064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
0.336 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +27001%
91.06 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Dec 2022
GeForce 8
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
142
112
Shading Units
18176
56
TMUs
568
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
33.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
336.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
AD102
G92-270-A2
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net