NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
0.336 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+814%
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 8
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
33.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
336.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
DG2-128
G92-270-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
