NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
RTX A1000
+4110%
6.737 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 8
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
727 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
18
64
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.737 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.737 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
