NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+7400%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 8
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
22
64
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
