Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
4448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
0.093 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +13480%
12.63 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2007
Release Date
Sep 2021
GeForce 8
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
70
32
Shading Units
4480
16
TMUs
280
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
92.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

47W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GA100
G84-303-A2
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net