NVIDIA GeForce 840M vs Intel Arc Pro A30M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 840M and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 840M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (2000MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 840M
0.863 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M
+374%
4.096 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce 840M
67
Arc Pro A30M
+464%
378
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 800M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1001 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.02GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
DG2-128
N15S-GT
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
