NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
18168 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400
0.021 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+433519%
91.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2007
Release Date
Dec 2022
GeForce 8
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
142
8
Shading Units
18176
4
TMUs
568
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
