Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 8400 SE and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 SE
0.029 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900 +2017%
0.614 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 8
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86S
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net