NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI308X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI308X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI308X 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
19440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS
0.029 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI308X
+281693%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2007
Release Date
Dec 2023
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
192GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM3
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
19456
8
TMUs
1216
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
750W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
G86-213-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
153 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
