Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS
0.029 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 +9724%
2.849 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 8400 GS
369
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 +866%
3566

Graphics Card

Apr 2007
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
14
16
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
TU117
G86-213-A2
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net