NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs Intel Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 200W)
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
Arc A780
+46105%
18.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2007
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 8
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
