NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1200MHz vs 941MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 825M
0.723 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+239%
2.458 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 800M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
850 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
941 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.528 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
30.11 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
722.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
30.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK208
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
