NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs AMD FirePro W6150M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 820M and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 28.83GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 820M
0.622 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M
+165%
1.651 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 820M
192
FirePro W6150M
+656%
1452
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 800M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
901 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.83GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.480 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
25.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
25.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.170
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
