NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs Intel Arc A350M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 820M and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1150MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 28.83GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 820M
0.622 TFLOPS
Arc A350M
+183%
1.766 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 820M
192
Arc A350M
+1331%
2749
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2022
GeForce 800M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
901 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.83GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.480 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
25.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
25.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
