NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 810M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 810M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 77% (1680MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 810M
0.73 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+4378%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 800M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
835 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
76
384
Shading Units
9728
32
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
30.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
729.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
30.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
AD103
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
