NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 410M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 410M
0.11 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+2134%
2.458 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 410M
72
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+4275%
3150
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 400M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
16
48
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.148 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
4.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
110.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
9.176 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
12W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF119
GPU Name
TU117
N12M-GS
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
