NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs Intel Arc Pro A60M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 410M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 95W)
Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 410M
0.11 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60M
+4740%
5.325 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce 400M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.148 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
4.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
110.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
9.176 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
12W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF119
GPU Name
DG2-256
N12M-GS
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
Unknown
79 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
