NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs Intel Arc A380M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M and 6GB VRAM Arc A380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 410M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 35W)
Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 410M
0.11 TFLOPS
Arc A380M
+3623%
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
GeForce 400M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.1)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1550 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.148 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
4.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
110.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
9.176 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
12W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF119
GPU Name
DG2-128
N12M-GS
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
