NVIDIA GeForce 320M vs Intel UHD Graphics 617
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 617 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel UHD Graphics 617 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M
0.091 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 617
+342%
0.403 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2018
GeForce 300M
Generation
HD Graphics-T
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.150 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
806.4 GFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
403.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Amber Lake GT2
MCP89-EPT
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 9.5
-
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
