NVIDIA GeForce 320M vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 45W)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
272 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M
0.091 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
+708%
0.736 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2013
GeForce 300M
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
184.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Haswell GT3e
MCP89-EPT
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 7.5
-
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
22 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
