NVIDIA GeForce 320M vs Intel GMA X3500
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M and 0System Shared VRAM GMA X3500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 320M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
48 additional rendering cores
Intel GMA X3500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 23W)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 300M
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
FSB
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
-
16
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
667.0 MPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.336 GTexel/s
-
-
-
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
23W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Bearlake
MCP89-EPT
GPU Variant
Bearlake (G35)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 4.0
-
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c
3.3
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0
