NVIDIA GeForce 320M vs AMD FirePro A320
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 100W)
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock955MHz
336 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M
0.091 TFLOPS
FirePro A320
+705%
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 300M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
23W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Devastator
MCP89-EPT
GPU Variant
A320
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
-
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
32 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
