NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock600MHz
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics
+69%
0.154 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2016
GeForce 300M
Generation
Stoney Ridge
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
600 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
128
16
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
153.6 GFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
153.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
9.600 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Stoney
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
-
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
