NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock921MHz
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Jetson Nano GPU
+159%
0.236 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2019
GeForce 300M
Generation
Tegra
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
640 MHz
-
Boost Clock
921 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
128
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.74 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.74 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
471.6 GFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
235.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
GM20B
MCP89
GPU Variant
TM660M-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
-
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
20 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
5.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
