NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel Arc Graphics 24EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 24EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 65W)
Intel Arc Graphics 24EU 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 24EU
+743%
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2024
GeForce 300M
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
12
8
ROPs
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.536 TFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
23W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
-
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
3 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
17.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
243 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
