NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
0.049 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64
+22471%
11.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 300M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1250 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
345.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
691.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Vega 10
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT
(215-0894200)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
