NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs AMD Radeon E9174 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9174 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon E9174 MXM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
0.049 TFLOPS
Radeon E9174 MXM
+2446%
1.248 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Oct 2017
GeForce 300M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1124 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Lexa
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
E9170
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
