NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
0.049 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+4916%
2.458 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 300M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
16
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
TU117
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
