NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 134W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
+3422%
1.585 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2009
Release Date
Mar 2013
GeForce 300
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
144.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.51 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.05 GTexel/s
-
-
-
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.585 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
66.05 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
134W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GK106
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
GK106-240-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
