NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5360 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT
+165310%
64.51 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
84
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
5376
8
TMUs
336
4
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Navi 31
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
