NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6600 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 160W)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2589MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6600 XT
+27079%
10.6 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 210
285
Radeon RX 6600 XT
+3288%
9656
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Jul 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1968 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2589 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.7 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.21 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.60 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
662.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Navi 23
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 23 XT
(215-130000006)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
