NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300
+11776%
4.632 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 210
285
Radeon RX 5300
+1181%
3653
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
May 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
22
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1408
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Navi 14
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
