NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD P30PH
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 4GB VRAM P30PH to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 180W)
AMD P30PH 's Advantages
Boost Clock1206MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (268.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
P30PH
+12566%
4.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1206 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2100 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
268.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.59 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
154.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.940 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.940 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
308.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
180W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Polaris 20
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
