NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA P102 101
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 10GB VRAM P102 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3184 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
P102 101
+27310%
10.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Jan 2018
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1670 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
10GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
25
16
Shading Units
3200
8
TMUs
200
4
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.6 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
334.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
167.0 GFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.69 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
334.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GP102
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
GP102-101-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
