NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
8176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+62925%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
8192
8
TMUs
512
4
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
450W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
22 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
