NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 106W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.73GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450
+1441%
0.601 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 210
+15%
285
GeForce GTS 450
246
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Sep 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
4
16
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.264 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
601.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.11 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
106W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GF106
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
GF106-250-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
