NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD FireStream 9370
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 225W)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1584 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370
+6669%
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1600
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Cypress
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
