NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA B100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 96GB VRAM B100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B100 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.10TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
16880 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
B100
+159079%
62.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Nov 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Server Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
96GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
4.10TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
132
16
Shading Units
16896
8
TMUs
528
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GB102
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
104 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
10.1
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
