NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs Intel Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
+8828%
3.482 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 210
285
Arc Pro A40
+1067%
3328
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
DG2-128
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
